Policy Identification
Priority: Twenty-first Century Professionals
Category: Qualifications and Evaluations
Policy ID Number: TCP-C-004
Policy Title: Policy establishing the Teacher Performance Appraisal process
Current Policy Date: 09/01/2011
Other Historical Information: Previous Board dates: 07/07/1987, 07/11/1996, 11/05/1998,10/02/2008, 08/04/2011
Statutory Reference:
Administrative Procedures Act (APA) Reference Number and Category:
Purpose
The intended purpose of the North Carolina
Teacher Evaluation Process is to assess the teacher’s performance in relation
to the North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards and to design a plan for
professional growth. The principal or a designee (hereinafter
“principal”) will conduct the evaluation process in which the teacher will
actively participate through the use of self-assessment, reflection,
presentation of artifacts, and classroom demonstration(s).
A local board shall use the North Carolina
Professional Teaching Standards and North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process
unless it develops an alternative evaluation that is properly validated and
that includes standards and criteria similar to those in the North Carolina
Professional Teaching Standards and North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process.
Process
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation
Process shall include the following components:
Component 1: Training
Before
participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer
evaluators must complete training on the evaluation process.
Component 2: Orientation
Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of
work in any school year, the principal will provide the teacher with a copy of
or directions for obtaining access to a copy of:
A. The Rubric for
Evaluating North Carolina Teachers;
B. This
policy; and
C.
A schedule for completing all the components of the evaluation process.
Copies may be provided by electronic means.
Component 3: Teacher Self-Assessment
Using the Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina
Teachers, the teacher shall rate his or her own performance at the beginning of
the year and reflect on his or her performance throughout the year.
Component 4: Pre-Observation Conference
Before
the first formal observation, the principal shall meet with the teacher to
discuss the teacher’s self- assessment based on the Rubric for Evaluating North
Carolina Teachers, the teacher’s most recent professional growth plan, and the
lesson(s) to be observed. The teacher will provide the principal with a
written description of the lesson(s). The goal of this conference is to prepare
the principal for the observation. Pre-Observation conferences are not required
for subsequent observations.
Component 5: Observations
A.
A formal observation shall last at least forty-five minutes or an entire class
period.
B.
Probationary Teachers
1.
The principal shall conduct at least three formal observations of all
probationary teachers.
2. A peer
shall conduct one formal observation of a probationary teacher.
C.
Career Status Teachers
1.
Career teachers shall be evaluated annually.
2.
During the year in which a career
status teacher participates in a summative evaluation, the principal shall
conduct at least three observations, including at least one formal observation.
During
observations, the principal and peer (in the case of a probationary teacher)
shall note the teacher’s performance in relationship to the applicable
Standards on the Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers.
Component 6: Post-Observation Conference
The
principal shall conduct a post-observation conference no later than ten school
days after each formal observation. During the post-observation
conference, the principal and teacher shall discuss and document on the Rubric
the strengths and weaknesses of the teacher’s performance during the observed
lesson.
Component 7: Summary Evaluation Conference and Scoring
the Teacher Summary Rating Form
Prior to the end of the school year and in
accordance with LEA timelines, the principal shall conduct a summary evaluation
conference with the teacher. During the summary evaluation conference,
the principal and teacher shall discuss the teacher’s self-assessment, the
teacher’s most recent Professional Growth Plan, the components of the North
Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process completed during the year, classroom
observations, artifacts submitted or collected during the evaluation process
and other evidence of the teacher’s performance on the Rubric.
At the conclusion of the North Carolina Teacher
Evaluation Process, the principal shall:
A.
Give a rating for each
Element in the Rubric;
B.
Make a written comment on any Element marked “Not Demonstrated”;
C.
Give an overall rating of each Standard in the Rubric;
D.
Provide the teacher with
the opportunity to add comments to the Teacher Summary Rating Form;
E.
Review the completed
Teacher Summary Rating Form with the teacher; and
F.
Secure the teacher’s
signature on the Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities and Teacher Summary
Rating Form.
Component 8: Professional Development
Plans
Individual
Growth Plans
Teachers who are rated at least “Proficient” on
all the Standards on the Teacher Summary Rating Form shall develop an
Individual Growth Plan designed to improve performance on specifically
identified Standards and Elements.
Monitored Growth Plans
A teacher shall be placed on a Monitored Growth
Plan whenever he or she:
A.
Is rated “Developing” on one or more Standards on the Teacher Summary Rating
Form; and
B.
Is not recommended for dismissal, demotion or nonrenewal.
A Monitored Growth Plan shall, at a minimum,
identify the Standards and Elements to be improved, the goals to be
accomplished and the activities the teacher should undertake to achieve
Proficiency, and a timeline which allows the teacher one school year to achieve
Proficiency. A Monitored Growth Plan that meets those criteria shall be
deemed to satisfy the requirements of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 115C-333(b).
Directed Growth Plans
A teacher shall be placed on a Directed
Growth Plan whenever he or she:
A. Is rated
1.
“Not Demonstrated” on any Standard on the Teacher Summary Rating Form; or
2.
“Developing” on one or more Standards on the Teacher Summary Rating Form for
two sequential years; and
B. Is not recommended for
dismissal, demotion or nonrenewal.
The Directed Growth Plan shall, at a minimum,
identify the Standards and Elements to be improved, the goals to be
accomplished, the activities the teacher shall complete to achieve Proficiency,
a timeline for achieving Proficiency within one school year or such shorter
time as determined by the LEA. A Directed Growth Plan that meets those
criteria shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of N.C. Gen. Stat. §
115C-333(b).
Component 9: Effective Dates and Effect on Licensing
and Career Status
Effective
with the 2008-2009 school year, LEAs may evaluate teachers using this policy.
Effective
with the 2010-2011 school year, all teachers in North Carolina will be
evaluated using this policy unless
a local board develops an alternative evaluation that is properly validated and
that includes standards and criteria similar to those in the North Carolina
Professional Teaching Standards and North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process
in which case the local board shall use that instrument.
Beginning Teachers
Effective
2010-2011, beginning teachers must be rated “Proficient” on all five North Carolina
Professional Teaching Standards on the most recent Teacher Summary Rating Form
in order to be eligible for the Standard Professional 2 License.
Probationary Teachers
Effective
2010-2011, a principal must rate a probationary teacher as “Proficient” on all
five North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards on the most recent Teacher
Summary Rating Form before recommending that teacher for career status.
Process for Abbreviated Annual Evaluations
The annual evaluation requirement for career-status teachers
can be met through the Teacher Evaluation Process set forth above, or an
abbreviated evaluation.
An abbreviated evaluation consists of evaluator ratings only
on Standards One, Four, and Six of the Teacher Evaluation Process.
The abbreviated evaluation process for Standards One, Four,
and Six remains consistent with the Teacher Evaluation Process described above
with the exception of the requirement for observations.
Teachers receiving an abbreviated evaluation should receive two
informal observations of a minimum of twenty minutes each. Observers shall note the teacher’s
performance in relationship to Standards One and Four on the Rubric for Evaluating
North Carolina Teachers.
Teachers receiving an abbreviated evaluation may request that the
evaluator conduct a formal observation as described above.